In
order to understand another organization that is considered a CAS organization,
we must correctly define what a CAS is and what those organizations consist of.
Complex Adaptive Leadership (CAS) is defined as, “the term meant to reflect a
dynamic organization where teams are formed, perform, and then disappear as the
need arises… the foundation of this dynamic are clear people processes and
policies, sound and flexible information and communication technology systems,
and transparent, inclusive and flexible strategy development processes”
(Obolensky, 2010). It can also be stated that these types of organizations are
also defined as special cases of complex
systems and are often defined as a “complex macroscopic collection”
of relatively similar connected micro-structures. These micro-structures are
formed in order to adapt to the changing environment, and increase its
survivability as a macro-structure (the bigger picture).
I
would like to take a step back in that I think I am looking at this concept too
tightly. I have been trying to write this blog for the better part of a week
now and I think it was because I was too tightly caught up in finding this type
of organization I am supposed to write about but if a CAS is about an
organization that has teams that arise and fall when needed to perform certain
tasks then I think most organizations have those types of principles. When
certain tasks need to be performed committees are created in order to evaluate
a process or the creation of a new idea are those not a part of a CAS?
I
know for a fact that the organization I work for relies heavily on groups
appearing and disappearing in order to complete certain needs for
organizational success but if I have to select one company or a strain of similar
companies take for instance Johnson & Johnson. This organization has been
around for decades (multiple decades at that) and they are comprised of a
traditional hierarchy but they customer service based organization needs the
input of others in order to create new products; this is where the teams are
formed. The dynamics come from upper management who pull their resources
together to create these teams of people who know what their one purpose is and
when that purpose has been fulfilled the group or team dissolves and can be
reborn again in a different way.
Being
complex doesn’t mean it has to be complicated. I think sometimes we take those
two and make them one although they are two separate ideas. I have found that
any organization can be a CAS if there is flexibility within the infrastructure.
Obolensky, N. (2012). Complex adaptive
leadership, embracing paradox and uncertainty. Gower Publishing Company.
No comments:
Post a Comment