What is a high performance team and what does it look like?
- A high-performance team has attributes such as
- Performance Outcomes
- Specific, shared purposes and visions
- Mutual and internal accountability
- Blurring of formal distinctions
- Coordinated and shared work roles
- Efficiency
- Extraordinarily high quality
- Creative and continuous improvement
- High credibility and trust
- Clarity of core competence
What other, more detailed attributes define a high
performance team?
- High performance teams are more likely centered on one goal and are highly focused on the goal/task. It is common to see that high-performance teams will outperform other teams because of the expectations set upon them. Most high-performance teams have individuals who have the ability to interchange their roles at any given time giving the group the ability to be multidimensional.
An example of high performance team (personal example)
- I have been a part of many different types of team dynamics and high-performance teams are a part of them as well. Currently I work for a team that is constantly pushing the bar and trying to become more efficient in the high education spectrum as well as more cutting edge. Being a part of this team sub-teams have been created (or committees) to help with initiating new projects and completing new initiatives. One of those committees is the New Programs & Partnerships Committee which specializes in opening new locations and start new academic programs. This committee is overseen by the Leadership Council and a meeting administrator. Over the past year our team has successfully been able to open multiple new locations, programs and partnerships. These types of accomplishments could not take place unless high-performance attributes such as efficiency, shared work roles and internal accountability were not in place. As this committee grows we have now expanded to including a campus closure procedure which helps to regulate all of the campus closing policies. With these processes in place we are able to stay more detail oriented this in turn positively effects multiple departments.
Examine
the four patterns of working together and detail one positive and one negative
experience. What could you have done to influence the outcomes?
- Work Group
- Although work groups are considered a team they really are a combination of high level management who report the same director but have little to no collaboration together
- Positive - I personally have not worked in a work group but I do feel that at times those types of dynamics can be seen within the university that I work for. Although the Leadership team and council work as a unit not every aspect of their jobs overlap with every department yet they all answer to the same person.
- Negative - These types of groups can be unless in my opinion if they are not collaborating to some degree. I find it hard to work for the same organization and not to some degree have overlapping areas and or times for collaboration.
- Team
- A team is a unit of people who work together for the betterment of the organization. A collection of people (any level can make a team).
- Positive - Teams allow for different levels of collaboration as well as provided a breakdown of the different strengths and weaknesses each person can bring to the organization
- Negative - At times teams can form too many opinions and or people will feel as though their voice isn’t being heard. When working in a team there has to areas of give and take in order to be successful.
- Community
- This is a different type of team and sometimes due to its less structured dynamic can fissile out over time.
- Positive - Allows for many people to be a part of the bigger picture. Communities are wonderful team building opportunities.
- Negative - Communities have to be maintained and if not properly nurtured can end. Everyone has to want to make the community last. Without equal participation it can and often does fail.
- Network
- A collection of people sharing the same ideas, thoughts or interests. Example; Facebook, LinkedIn or Pinterest.
- Positive - Allows for many people to be a part of the network and openly share ideas. Networking allows for many people to meet and mingle from all different areas of the world or intermix different industries. This is a great tool for the working man or woman.
- Negative - I find that the only negative would be the over networker in that someone who is constantly networking to meet people but not contributing the bigger picture. You have to not only meet people but also share in the network community.